Books

Papers/Articles

Books : reviews

[cover]

John L. Casti. Alternate Realities: mathematical models of nature and man. Wiley. 1989

 

[cover]

John L. Casti. Paradigms Lost: images of man in the mirror of science. Abacus. 1989

 

[cover]

John L. Casti, Anders Karlqvist, editors. Boundaries and Barriers: on the limits of scientific knowledge. Perseus. 1996

 

Contents

John D. Barrow.
Limits of science
John L. Casti.
The outer limits: in search of the "unknowable" in science
N. C. A. da Costa, F. A. Doria.
Variations on an original theme
Walter Fontana, Leo W. Buss.
The barrier of objects: from dynamical systems to bounded organizations
James B. Hartle.
Scientific knowledge from the perspective of quantum cosmology
Piet Hut.
Structuring reality: the role of limits
Harold J. Morowitz.
Complexity and epistemology
Robert Rosen.
On the limitiations of scientific knowledge
Karl Svozil.
Undecidability everywhere?
Joseph F. Traub.
On reality and models

[cover]

John L. Casti. Would-Be Worlds: how simulation is changing the frontiers of science. Wiley. 1997

 

[cover]

Cristian S. Calude, John L. Casti, Michael J. Dinneen, editors. Unconventional Models of Computation, UMC'98: Auckland, New Zealand. Springer. 1998

 

Contents

Martyn Amos, Steve Wilson, David A. Hodgson, Gerald Owenson, Alan Gibbons.
Practical Implementation of DNA Computations
Artur Ekert, Chiara Macchiavello.
An Overview of Quantum Computing
H. Jeff Kimble.
Implementing Quantum Logic and Communication via Cavity QED
Seth Lloyd.
Unconventional Quantum Computing Devices
Cristopher Moore.
Finite-Dimensional Analog Computers: Flows, Maps, and Recurrent Neural Networks
John H. Reif.
Paradigms for Biomolecular Computation
Arto Salomaa.
Turing, Watson-Crick and Lindenmayer. Aspects of DNA Complementarity
Gordon Alford.
Explicitly Constructing Universal Extended H Systems
Mark H. Butler, Raymond C. Paton, Paul H. Leng.
Unconventional Approaches for Biologically Inspired Computing
Elena Calude, Marjo Lipponen.
Deterministic Incomplete Automata: Simulation, Universality and Complementarity
B. Jack Copeland.
Even Turing Machines Can Compute Uncomputable Functions
Michael Frank, Thomas F. Knight Jr, Norman H. Margolus.
Reversibility in Optimally Scalable Computer Architectures
Michael Frank, Carlin Vieri, M. Josephine Ammer, Nicole Love, Norman H. Margolus, Thomas F. Knight Jr.
A Scalable Reversible Computer in Silicon
Rudolf Freund, Valeria Mihalache.
Molecular Computations on Circular and Linear Strings
Yuzhen Ge, Layne T. Watson, Emmanuel G. Collins Jr..
Genetic Algorithms for Optimization on a Quantum Computer
Karl Gustafson.
Ergodic Learning Algorithms
Peter Herding.
Embedding Cellular Automata into Reversible Ones
Thomas F. Knight Jr, Gerald Jay Sussman.
Cellular Gate Technology
Alexandru Mateescu.
Splicing on Routes: a Framework of DNA Computation
Hideaki Matsueda.
Spatiotemporal Evolution of Quantum Entangled Pure States in Quantum Computing Solid Block Circuits
Lakshmi Narayanaswamy, Peter M. Kogge.
Combinators and Processing-In-Memory: An Unconventional Basis for Avoiding the Memory Wall
Mitsunori Ogihara, Animesh Ray.
The Minimum DNA Computation Model and Its Computational Power
Gheorghe Paun.
Distributed Architectures in DNA Computing Based on Splicing: Limiting the Size of Components
Boris S. Pavlov, Gary Roach, Adil Yafyasov.
Resonance Scattering and Design of Quantum Gates
Yuzuru Sato, Makoto Taiji, Takashi Ikegami.
Self-Similar Sets as Satisfiable Boolean Expressions
Karl Svozil.
The Church-Turing Thesis as a Guiding Principle for Physics
Carlin Vieri, M. Josephine Ammer, Amory Wakefield, Lars "Johnny" Svensson, William Athas, Thomas F. Knight Jr.
Designing Reversible Memory
Herbert Wiklicky.
Quantitative Computation by Hilbert Machines

[cover]

John L. Casti, Anders Karlqvist, editors. Mission to Abisko: stories and myths in the creation of scientific "truth". Perseus. 1999

Rating: 3.5
[ unmissable | great stuff | worth reading | passes the time | waste of time | unfinishable ]

reviewed 12 August 2001

The 1997 annual Abisko seminar brought together scientists and science fiction writers to discuss the use and importance of narrative in science. This collects together some of the participants' papers. Most are interesting, but maybe not quite long enough to develop their ideas in full. I suspect the conference itself was quite fun.

All the participants agree that story-telling is important in how we understand science, at whatever level. The fiction writers also reckon that SF is important for insulating us from surprises when new technology appears in our lives, for allowing us to have already had the ethical debates in fiction. However, Paul McAuley points out that the media and the public tend to go for the emotional horror slant, rather than the more rational SFnal perspective -- so maybe SF insulates only SF fans?

Contents

John D. Barrow.
The Analogy of Nature
Scientists use analogies to describe nature; this may be limiting what theories they can come up with. There may be no analogies for deep theories.
Greg Bear.
Proving the Dream
How science fiction and science work together to change the future
Gregory Benford.
Beyond this Horizon: envisioning the next century, or stories of our (preventable?) future(s)
The 20th century saw incredible advances due to physics; the 21st will see even more, due to biology.
John L. Casti.
The Cambridge Quintet: the chronicle of an experiment in 'scientific fiction'
The reasons for using 'scientific fiction' to explain science
Jack Cohen.
Becoming Maureen -- a story of development
The importance, and difficulty, of understanding process. [I felt I was coming in at the second part of some larger story.]
Per-A. Johansson.
Algorithmic and Asthetic Storytelling: alternative approaches to imagination and reality
Our current scientific, or "algorithmic" style of story telling doesn't cover everything -- we still need stories of how to live our lives. [Unfortunately, from my point of view, Johansson has a god in these stories. I do feel we need these higher level stories, but I prefer ones we explicitly construct for ourselves, rather than ones attempting to discern some non-existent Platonic ideal.]
Kjell Jonsson.
Einstein at the Amusement Park: the public story of relativity in Swedish culture
Einstein's theories of relativity were not well-received in Sweden, neither by the Nobel Committee, nor by the scientific community
Anders Karlqvist.
Telling Science
There are at least four different levels for communicating science, depending on the audience -- and all four are valuable
Paul J. McAuley.
Frankenstein's Daughters
SF looks at scientific advances neutrally -- story outcomes may be good or bad. Horror starts with the emotional "yuk" factor, and it's always bad. And now science is advancing so fast that we are running out of SF stories to prepare us for the future.
Larry Niven.
Mission to Abisko
A personal journal of his last-minute attendance at the conference
Ian Stewart.
Secret Narratives of Mathematics
A plea that mathematicians pay attention to the narrative structure of their proofs, telling a compelling, understandable "story", rather than just concentrating on the "syntax"

[cover]

John L. Casti. Five More Golden Rules. Wiley. 2000

 

The Alexander Polynomial: knot theory
The Hopf Bifurcation Theorem: dynamical system theory
The Kalman Filter: control theory
The Hahn-Banach Theorem: functional analysis
The Shannon Coding Theorem: information theory

[cover]

John L. Casti. Paradigms Regained: a further exploration of the mysteries of modern science. Little, Brown. 2000